A Harris-Walz Presidency: A Nightmarish Threat to Free Speech

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley expresses grave concerns about the future of free speech in the United States if Kamala Harris and Tina Walz are elected president and vice president, respectively. Turley warns that the anti-free speech movement is gaining ground internationally and that a Harris-Walz administration would accelerate this trend within the U.S.

The recent decision by Brazil's Supreme Court to uphold a ban on X has raised alarms about the potential for similar actions in the United States. Fox News contributor and constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley weighs in on these concerns, arguing that Americans must take them seriously as the anti-free speech movement gains momentum globally.

A Harris-Walz Presidency: A Nightmarish Threat to Free Speech

Turley emphasizes that the anti-free speech movement has been growing worldwide, utilizing various tactics to silence dissenting views. He cites efforts in Europe to arrest platform CEOs and threats against Elon Musk for his defense of free speech. Brazil's ban on X, however, represents a significant escalation, demonstrating the potential for direct censorship of entire platforms.

Turley expresses particular concern about the potential impact of a Harris-Walz administration on free speech in the United States. He highlights Vice President Harris's previous statements suggesting that she views speech as a privilege that can be revoked. This perspective, he argues, aligns with the ultimate goal of the anti-free speech movement: to take down platforms that allow opposing views to be expressed.

A Harris-Walz Presidency: A Nightmarish Threat to Free Speech

The anti-free speech movement is also targeting the First Amendment, with some advocating for amendments that would weaken its protections. Turley dismisses these arguments, emphasizing the individualistic nature of the amendment as a fundamental aspect of its purpose. He believes that Congress should protect free speech, not undermine it.

Turley asserts that free speech is a central issue in the upcoming presidential election. He argues that voters should prioritize candidates who support the First Amendment and recognize its vital importance in a democratic society. In 1800, Thomas Jefferson defeated John Adams in an election where free speech was the primary issue. Turley believes that free speech should once again be a defining factor in the 2024 election.

A Harris-Walz Presidency: A Nightmarish Threat to Free Speech

Turley discusses the specific case of Brazil's ban on X, highlighting the Supreme Court's justification that the platform had allowed posts that undermined the country's democracy. However, he questions the court's authority to make such a determination, arguing that it sets a dangerous precedent for censorship.

Turley raises concerns about the Biden-Harris administration's alleged connections to censorship efforts. He cites Vice President Harris's previous support for banning President Trump from Twitter. These actions, he argues, suggest that the administration may support broader efforts to restrict speech in the future.

A Harris-Walz Presidency: A Nightmarish Threat to Free Speech

Turley draws comparisons between Brazil's suppression of free speech and similar actions taken in other countries. He warns that such trends could spread to the United States, leading to a suppression of dissenting voices and a diminished democratic discourse.

Turley urges Americans to recognize the threat posed by the anti-free speech movement and to actively defend the First Amendment. He believes that the upcoming election provides a crucial opportunity to elect candidates who will protect this fundamental right.

Jonathan Turley's analysis presents a compelling case for the urgent need to prioritize free speech in the United States. He warns that a Harris-Walz presidency could have dire consequences for the First Amendment and that Americans must take action to preserve this essential pillar of democracy.