Cohen's Lies and Legal Shenanigans: The Turning Point in Trump's Trial

Michael Cohen's admission of stealing from the Trump Organization and his blatant lies have damaged his credibility as a key witness in the NY v. Trump trial, potentially swaying jurors in favor of Trump's acquittal.

Michael Cohen, former lawyer to Donald Trump, has cast a shadow of doubt over his credibility in the ongoing NY v. Trump trial. On Monday, Cohen admitted to stealing from the Trump Organization, a startling revelation that has shifted the narrative of the case.

In a crucial Perry Mason moment, Cohen confessed to pocketing $30,000 from the Trump campaign's hiring of Red Finch, a tech firm hired to discredit unfavorable polls. Prosecutors had neglected to probe Cohen about this theft, which has raised questions about their preparation and competence.

The prosecution's failure to anticipate Cohen's confession is seen as a major blunder. The Trump campaign's deal with Red Finch, which involved the delivery of $20,000 in cash by Cohen, has raised eyebrows and may further damage the credibility of the former Trump lawyer.

Cohen's explanation for stealing from the Trump Organization as "self-help" due to a reduced bonus has been met with skepticism. Many observers question the validity of this motive, suggesting that Cohen's actions were driven by personal greed and a desire for revenge.

The defense called Robert Costello, Cohen's former lawyer, as a key witness. Costello testified that Cohen repeatedly denied having any damaging information on Trump, a claim that contradicts Cohen's previous statements. This revelation has raised further doubts about Cohen's reliability as a witness.

Costello's disrespectful behavior in court, including audible exclamations of disbelief and eye-rolling, drew the ire of Judge Juan Merchan. The judge's severe lecture to Costello has been seen as a sign of the court's frustration with the defense's tactics.

While the prosecution has additional witnesses and documents, Cohen's role remains pivotal in directly tying Trump to the hush money payments at the heart of the case. Cohen's evisceration on the stand could significantly weaken the prosecution's case and bolster the belief that Trump was unaware of the illicit payments.

The prosecution's failure to fully scrutinize Cohen's theft from the Trump Organization, coupled with his admission of lying on multiple occasions, has created a strong case for Trump's acquittal. If jurors conclude that Cohen is not credible, they may be less likely to convict Trump on the charges of falsifying business records.

The NY v. Trump trial has been marred by allegations of partisanship, with many observers questioning the political motivations behind the charges. The outcome of the trial remains highly uncertain, with the possibility of an acquittal looming large.

Michael Cohen's admission of stealing from the Trump Organization and his numerous lies have severely damaged his credibility in the NY v. Trump trial. The prosecution's sloppiness and Costello's disrespectful behavior have further weakened the case against Trump. As closing arguments approach, the possibility of an acquittal becomes increasingly likely, casting doubt on the prosecution's ability to prove Trump's knowledge of the hush money payments.