DoJ Antitrust Case Against Google Raises Concerns of Conflict of Interest

The House Judiciary Committee has requested a briefing from the Justice Department (DoJ) regarding potential conflicts of interest and political bias in its antitrust lawsuit against Google. The request stems from reports that Google's lead attorney is simultaneously prepping Vice President Kamala Harris for her upcoming debate with former President Donald Trump.

The House Judiciary Committee, led by Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), has sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland requesting a briefing on how the DoJ is addressing potential conflicts of interest and political bias in its lawsuit against Google. The committee is particularly concerned about the involvement of Karen Dunn, Google's lead attorney, who is also advising Vice President Harris in her debate preparation.

DoJ Antitrust Case Against Google Raises Concerns of Conflict of Interest

Dunn's dual role has raised concerns that her relationship with key figures in the Biden-Harris administration could bias the department's approach in the Google case. The Trump campaign has already called attention to the potential conflict of interest, alleging collusion between the Biden-Harris administration and Google to censor conservative voices.

In his letter, Jordan cited Fox News Digital reporting that Dunn is listed as a "lead attorney" in the Google antitrust case while also serving on Harris' campaign team. He questioned how this arrangement aligns with the independence and impartiality expected from the DoJ.

DoJ Antitrust Case Against Google Raises Concerns of Conflict of Interest

Jordan emphasized that Garland pledged to guarantee the independence of the DoJ from partisan influence when he was nominated as attorney general. Jordan argues that Dunn's dual role contradicts this promise, raising concerns about the fairness and integrity of the Google investigation.

The House Judiciary Committee and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government are investigating the extent to which the executive branch has colluded with companies to censor lawful speech. They believe that the Google case presents an opportunity to examine potential bias and conflicts of interest.

DoJ Antitrust Case Against Google Raises Concerns of Conflict of Interest

The DoJ has confirmed receiving the letter but has declined to comment on the matter. Neither the Harris campaign nor Dunn have responded to requests for comment on her involvement in both the debate and the Google lawsuit.

The revelations about Dunn's dual role come after Google faced scrutiny for its handling of the assassination attempt against Trump. The company's autocomplete search results initially did not register the incident, leading to accusations of bias against conservatives.

DoJ Antitrust Case Against Google Raises Concerns of Conflict of Interest

Google admitted that it blocked search prompts for the assassination attempt, claiming it was part of a policy to prevent predictions of violence against current figures. However, this policy has been criticized as arbitrary and potentially politically motivated.

The House Judiciary Committee's request for a briefing is a sign of growing concerns about the potential influence of Big Tech companies on government actions and the fairness of antitrust investigations. The outcome of the Google case could have implications for the regulation of the digital advertising market and the integrity of American political discourse.

DoJ Antitrust Case Against Google Raises Concerns of Conflict of Interest

The Google antitrust case is expected to continue in the coming months, and the ongoing debate over conflicts of interest and political bias will likely remain a central issue. The House Judiciary Committee's oversight will play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and accountability in the investigation.