Kamala Harris Campaign's Deceptive and Gaslighting Google Ad Tactic Draws Criticism

The Kamala Harris campaign has been manipulating Google search results by running ads featuring pro-Harris spin and edited headlines from reputable news organizations, a recent Axios report reveals. The tactic has raised concerns about deception and gaslighting, with critics arguing that it undermines trust in the media.

## Article:

Kamala Harris Campaign's Deceptive and Gaslighting Google Ad Tactic Draws Criticism

The revelation that the Kamala Harris campaign has been manipulating Google search results has sparked widespread criticism and concerns about the integrity of online information. According to an Axios report, the campaign has been running sponsored ads with edited headlines from several news outlets, including CNN, NPR, Reuters, and The Guardian, without their knowledge or permission.

These manipulated headlines feature pro-Harris spin that is not part of the original articles. For example, one ad linked to The Guardian displayed the headline "VP Harris Fights Abortion Bans - Harris Defends Repro Freedom," while another from NPR had the headline "Harris Will Lower Health Costs."

Kamala Harris Campaign's Deceptive and Gaslighting Google Ad Tactic Draws Criticism

The news outlets featured in these ads were caught off guard by the practice, with many expressing concerns about their brand being used inappropriately. A spokesperson for The Guardian stated that they would be reaching out to Google for more information about the practice.

While the Harris campaign's tactic does not violate Google's ad policies, critics argue that it exploits the credibility of these news organizations to mislead the public. The "Sponsored" label on the ads is insufficient to prevent them from mimicking real news results and potentially misleading users.

Kamala Harris Campaign's Deceptive and Gaslighting Google Ad Tactic Draws Criticism

The Axios report drew considerable attention and sparked criticism from both liberals and conservatives. Some liberals expressed disappointment in the campaign's tactics, while conservatives criticized the reporter who broke the story for allegedly downplaying its significance under pressure from liberals.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald criticized the reporter's apparent reversal, stating, "I was shocked yesterday when I saw Axios publish an investigation reflecting negatively on Kamala's campaign. But soon as the reporter, @sarafischer, was attacked for doing it, she immediately denigrated her own scoop, saying it was no big deal and Kamala did nothing wrong."

Even left-wing publications like The New Republic expressed concern, writing that the Harris campaign's tactics "may ultimately prove to be a gambit that lacks an actual advantage as it potentially undermines trust in the news."

Axios noted that the Trump campaign is not using this specific tactic, but that similar techniques have been used by campaigns in the past. Google's ad transparency center confirms this practice.

Google has said that the Harris campaign did not violate its rules, but the company's responsibility to prevent deceptive advertising practices has been called into question. The "Sponsored" label is not a sufficient safeguard against potential consumer harm.

The Harris campaign's tactics have raised concerns about the erosion of trust in the media. By injecting partisan spin into news headlines and descriptions through sponsored ads, the campaign undermines the credibility of these outlets and makes it more difficult for the public to discern fact from fiction.

The manipulation of Google search results by the Kamala Harris campaign has sparked serious concerns about the integrity of online information and the role of technology companies in preventing deceptive advertising practices. As the public increasingly relies on search engines for news and information, it is crucial to ensure that these platforms are not being used to mislead or deceive.