Kamala Harris' Flip-Flopping: A Playbook from Obama's Deception

Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy exposes Vice President Kamala Harris' inconsistencies, raising concerns about her credibility and whether she genuinely believes her new positions.

In the 2008 presidential race, Barack Obama emerged as a master of deception, strategically opposing gay marriage to secure votes despite his true beliefs. Former senior adviser David Axelrod later revealed Obama's admission of being uncomfortable with such dishonesty.

Now, Vice President Kamala Harris finds herself in a similar predicament, attempting to rebrand herself from a progressive to a centrist Democrat. Her abrupt reversals on key issues, including building a wall, fracking, Medicare-for-all, police reform, and gas-powered vehicles, have raised suspicions among voters.

Kamala Harris' Flip-Flopping: A Playbook from Obama's Deception

Unlike Obama's isolated stance on gay marriage, Harris is seeking to reverse a significant number of her long-held positions. This has prompted comparisons to Obama's successful deception, suggesting that Harris may be following a similar playbook to gain votes.

However, unlike Obama, Harris is facing scrutiny from voters who may not be as willing to accept her sudden transformations. The memory of Obama's past deception may linger in voters' minds, making them less likely to believe Harris' sincerity.

Kamala Harris' Flip-Flopping: A Playbook from Obama's Deception

Axelrod's memoir revealed Obama's strategic deception, a tactic that he bragged about despite its ethical implications. Many former Obama aides now surround Harris, raising concerns that they may be employing the same deceptive tactics to advance her campaign.

The media's response to Harris' flip-flopping is also significant. While base Democratic voters may be aware of the deception and tolerate it, independents and undecided voters may be more skeptical. They are likely to question Harris' true intentions and whether she genuinely believes the positions she now espouses.

Kamala Harris' Flip-Flopping: A Playbook from Obama's Deception

History shows that Obama faced no consequences for his deception on gay marriage. However, Harris may not be as fortunate. Voters may be more aware of her inconsistencies, making them less inclined to accept her sudden transformation.

If the past is any indication, Harris is likely to employ any position, no matter how contradictory, to gain votes. However, unlike Obama, she may face a more skeptical electorate that will hold her accountable for her true beliefs.

Kamala Harris' Flip-Flopping: A Playbook from Obama's Deception

The stakes are higher for Harris than they were for Obama, as voters may be less willing to forgive her deceptions. If her flip-flopping is perceived as a ploy for votes, it could cost her the presidency.