Supreme Court Under Siege: Former Attorneys General Demand Answers in Presidential Debate

Former Attorneys General call on ABC News to grill Trump and Harris on plans for the Supreme Court, amid a national debate on overhauling the institution.

The Supreme Court of the United States finds itself at the center of a contentious debate, with calls for its reform echoing across the nation. Former Attorneys General have now stepped into the fray, dispatching a letter to ABC News executives, demanding that the upcoming presidential debate addresses this critical issue.

Supreme Court Under Siege: Former Attorneys General Demand Answers in Presidential Debate

Led by William Barr, Edwin Meese, Michael Mukasey, and Jeff Sessions, the ex-Attorneys General have voiced concerns over the recent erosion of public trust in the Supreme Court. Citing a national debate ignited by the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade, the letter implores ABC to elicit the presidential candidates' stances on the future of the Court.

The letter underscores the profound impact of Supreme Court decisions on the lives of all Americans, emphasizing the need for a public discourse on the institution's structure, role, and jurisdiction. It highlights the array of proposals on the table, including term limits, an ethics code of conduct, and potential expansion of the Court.

Supreme Court Under Siege: Former Attorneys General Demand Answers in Presidential Debate

The ex-Attorneys General specifically urge ABC moderators to question Trump and Harris on their positions regarding expanding the Supreme Court. They stress that appointing justices to the Court is a consequential executive action, with lifetime implications for the ideological balance and impact on Americans' lives.

Furthermore, the letter urges the moderators to inquire about the criteria that Trump and Harris would consider when nominating justices to the Supreme Court, should vacancies arise during their potential presidencies. By eliciting their views on the appointment process, the public would gain valuable insights into their judicial philosophies.

Supreme Court Under Siege: Former Attorneys General Demand Answers in Presidential Debate

The former Attorneys General emphasize the importance of shedding light on this critical subject for the millions of Americans who care deeply about the Supreme Court. They express hope that the moderators will consider their suggested questions and provide a platform for the candidates to articulate their visions for the nation's highest judicial body.

ABC News has yet to respond to requests for comment on the letter, leaving the fate of these proposed questions in the hands of the debate organizers. However, the former Attorneys General's intervention has injected a sense of urgency into the debate, underscoring the pressing need for clarity on the future of the Supreme Court.

As the presidential election draws near, the eyes of the nation will be upon Trump and Harris, eagerly awaiting their responses to these crucial questions. The answers they provide will shape not only their potential presidencies but also the trajectory of the Supreme Court for generations to come.