Taliban Operations Have 'a Head Start' on Us: Former CIA Station Chief

Former CIA station chief Dan Hoffman details a 'significant and very sophisticated' campaign being run by terror cells in the Middle East.

## Article:

Taliban Operations Have 'a Head Start' on Us: Former CIA Station Chief

The massive intelligence failure in the lead up to the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan not only led to a chaotic evacuation, the death of 13 U.S. service members and 170 Afghans, as well as the complete Taliban takeover – it created a security vacuum that U.S. adversaries are taking advantage of.

As the U.S. looks to distance itself from its decadeslong War on Terror, adversaries like China and Russia have increasingly expanded their influence in South Asia and the Middle East.

Taliban Operations Have 'a Head Start' on Us: Former CIA Station Chief

While no nation has officially recognized the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan, some nations, including the U.S.’s top adversaries, have moved forward with establishing diplomatic relations with the extremist group.

Last year, Beijing said the Taliban should not be "excluded from the international community," and reports earlier this year suggested Moscow was considering removing the Taliban from its terrorist list – a further indication that both China and Russia are looking to use the region for their strategic aims.

Taliban Operations Have 'a Head Start' on Us: Former CIA Station Chief

Not only does the Taliban’s opposition to Western ideology play into Russian hands in spreading anti-American sentiment, Moscow is looking to expand trade with Afghanistan and other nations in the region to further alleviate economic pressure caused by Western sanctions.

The Taliban last year announced its intent to join China’s Belt and Road Initiative, and reports have suggested that Beijing is supplying the Taliban with drones, which could hamper the U.S.'s "over-the-horizon" strategy when it comes to Afghanistan.

Taliban Operations Have 'a Head Start' on Us: Former CIA Station Chief

The U.S.’s inability to foresee the Taliban takeover was not just an intelligence failure, it was indicative of a greater lapse in understanding of adversarial threats.

"The other issue, which I wouldn’t call an intelligence failure, I would call it a diplomatic failure – was the refusal to address Pakistan realistically," Rubin said.

Taliban Operations Have 'a Head Start' on Us: Former CIA Station Chief

Rubin pointed to findings one decade into the war in Afghanistan that showed 90% of the ammonium nitrate being used in Taliban roadside bombs were coming from two fertilizer factories in neighboring Pakistan.

Despite its ambiguous security position, the U.S. continues to keep close ties with Pakistan.

Taliban Operations Have 'a Head Start' on Us: Former CIA Station Chief

Beijing has also looked to Islamabad to expand bilateral economic partnerships through its Belt and Road Initiative, particularly the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, in which Beijing has invested some $62 billion.

Additionally, despite international pressure to walk a fine line when it comes to Russia, Pakistan has signaled it may be willing to aid Moscow in sidestepping the Western sanctions aimed at crippling its war effort through a "barter" trading system.

"It's wrong, simply, to look at Afghanistan in isolation," Rubin said, nodding to the root of the U.S.’s failure to assess the region’s overall state of security. "We have a tendency not to see the forest through the trees."

A yearslong probe released in 2023 showed that the collapse in U.S. intelligence spanning across the Trump and Biden administrations was rooted in Washington’s failure to correctly interpret the Afghan government’s ability to function without U.S. support.

"The Taliban were running roughshod over us, and our intelligence wasn't picking up a thing," Rubin said. "We were looking at Afghanistan through the lens of idealism and ideology. Here we were building a democracy. From an Afghan point of view, they were looking at it through the lens of survival."

The expert explained that Kabul fell as quickly as it did because the Taliban had been making inroads across the nation with local governors and district chiefs for one to two years ahead of the withdrawal.

"You actually had lots of families that would send one son to the Afghan National Security Forces – the army we were training – and the other son to the Taliban," Rubin explained. "The idea wasn't that they were favoring one power over the other, but this way if one of their family members were kidnapped at a checkpoint, they would always have someone they could call to try to get them sprung free."

Ultimately, the U.S.’s inability to understand Afghans, who lived under the constant threat of war for half a century following a coup in 1973, the Soviet-Afghan war throughout the 1980s, Taliban rule in the1990s and then the 20-year-long U.S. War on Terror, meant they did not recognize that the everyday Afghan would not fully trust that they could rely on the Afghan government without U.S. backing.

"It's what Usama Bin Laden said," Rubin continued, "when you have a choice between a strong horse and a weak pony…it's natural to tie yourself to the strong horse. That's what Afghans do."

Open source intelligence also showed that the Taliban had been making gains across Afghanistan in the year leading up to the withdrawal and questions have since mounted over why neither the Trump nor the Biden administration adjusted withdrawal plans accordingly.

"Unfortunately, ego always trumps good judgment when it comes to Washington policymaking," Rubin said. "The second issue was just exhaustion, and this notion that it was a two-decade war, the longest war in American history, and that by supporting the resistance, we would be restarting.""It was a persuasive argument," he added.